[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16290061#comment-16290061
 ] 

ASF GitHub Bot commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901:
-------------------------------------------

Github user phunt commented on a diff in the pull request:

    https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/377#discussion_r156809696
  
    --- Diff: src/docs/src/documentation/content/xdocs/zookeeperAdmin.xml ---
    @@ -949,14 +949,15 @@ server.3=zoo3:2888:3888</programlisting>
               </varlistentry>
     
               <varlistentry>
    -            <term>ttlNodesEnabled</term>
    +            <term>zookeeper.extendedTypesEnabled</term>
     
                 <listitem>
    -              <para>(No Java system property)</para>
    +                <para>(Java system property only: <emphasis
    --- End diff --
    
    This is a bit confusing given QuorumPeerConfig line 326
    
                    System.setProperty("zookeeper." + key, value);
    
    See the doc for forceSync for an example of a better way to set this up. 
(forceSync works this same way)



> Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2901
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: server
>    Affects Versions: 3.5.3
>         Environment: Running 3.5.3-beta in Docker container
>            Reporter: Mark Johnson
>            Assignee: Jordan Zimmerman
>            Priority: Blocker
>
> In the code that determines the EphemeralType it is looking at the owner 
> (which is the client ID or connection ID):
> EphemeralType.java:
>    public static EphemeralType get(long ephemeralOwner) {
>        if (ephemeralOwner == CONTAINER_EPHEMERAL_OWNER) {
>            return CONTAINER;
>        }
>        if (ephemeralOwner < 0) {
>            return TTL;
>        }
>        return (ephemeralOwner == 0) ? VOID : NORMAL;
>    }
> However my connection ID is:
> header.getClientId(): -720548323429908480
> This causes the code to think this is a TTL Ephemeral node instead of a
> NORMAL Ephemeral node.
> This also explains why this is random - if my client ID is non-negative
> then the node gets added correctly.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)

Reply via email to