[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3007?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16447132#comment-16447132
 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on ZOOKEEPER-3007:
--------------------------------------

+1 overall.  GitHub Pull Request  Build
      

    +1 @author.  The patch does not contain any @author tags.

    +1 tests included.  The patch appears to include 3 new or modified tests.

    +1 javadoc.  The javadoc tool did not generate any warning messages.

    +1 javac.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of javac 
compiler warnings.

    +1 findbugs.  The patch does not introduce any new Findbugs (version 3.0.1) 
warnings.

    +1 release audit.  The applied patch does not increase the total number of 
release audit warnings.

    +1 core tests.  The patch passed core unit tests.

    +1 contrib tests.  The patch passed contrib unit tests.

Test results: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1614//testReport/
Findbugs warnings: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1614//artifact/trunk/build/test/findbugs/newPatchFindbugsWarnings.html
Console output: 
https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1614//console

This message is automatically generated.

> Potential NPE in ReferenceCountedACLCache#deserialize 
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ZOOKEEPER-3007
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3007
>             Project: ZooKeeper
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 3.6.0
>            Reporter: lujie
>            Priority: Major
>
> Inspired by ZK-3006 , I develop a simple static analysis tool to find other 
> Potential NPE like ZK-3006. This bug is found by this tool ,and I have 
> carefully studied it.  But i am a newbie at here so i may be wrong, hope 
> someone could confirm it and help me improve this tool.
> h3. Bug describtion:
> callee BinaryInputArchive#startVector will return null:
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> public Index startVector(String tag) throws IOException {
>     int len = readInt(tag);
>      if (len == -1) {
>      return null;
> }
> {code}
> and caller ReferenceCountedACLCache#deserialize  call it without null check
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> Index j = ia.startVector("acls");
> while (!j.done()) {
>   ACL acl = new ACL();
>   acl.deserialize(ia, "acl");
> }{code}
> but all the other 14 caller of BinaryInputArchive#startVector performs null 
> checker like:
> {code:java}
> // code placeholder
> Index vidx1 = a_.startVector("acl");
>   if (vidx1!= null)
>      for (; !vidx1.done(); vidx1.incr()){
>      .....
>     }
>    }
> }
> {code}
> so i think we also need add null check in caller 
> ReferenceCountedACLCache#deserialize  just like other 14 caller
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

Reply via email to