+1 (non-binding) for early voluntarily move. I will update the pom files, there is a PR on the POM's anyway, and they are WIP.
Regards, Norbert On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 5:34 AM Michael Han <h...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 on voluntarily request to move. > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 11:36 AM Patrick Hunt <phu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Probably minor, but note there are some website pages that will also need > > to be updated: > > e.g. https://zookeeper.apache.org/git.html > > > > Patrick > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 10:58 AM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > +1 for moving to github now > > > > > > Enrico > > > > > > Il mer 12 dic 2018, 19:49 Tamas Penzes <tam...@cloudera.com.invalid> > ha > > > scritto: > > > > > > > Hi Patrick, > > > > > > > > Yes we have to upgrade the main pom.xml, just as the website and the > > > > documentation. > > > > Do we have to change git urls in old documentations as well? (People > > > might > > > > read them.) > > > > > > > > Thanks, Tamaas > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018, 18:31 Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org wrote: > > > > > > > > > Proactive sounds good to me. Can we schedule something outside the > > > > > holidays? > > > > > > > > > > Aside from Jenkins is there anything else we need to worry about? > > e.g. > > > I > > > > > see a reference in pom.xml > > > > > > > > > > pom.xml > > > > > 63: <developerConnection>scm:git: > > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper.git > > > > > </developerConnection> > > > > > 64: <url> > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=zookeeper.git > > > > </url> > > > > > > > > > > What's the impact wrt github.com and the Apache org? Will this > > enable > > > > use > > > > > to become admins at the same time? (greater control over the > > > issues/prs, > > > > > etc...) > > > > > > > > > > Patrick > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 9:07 AM Andor Molnar <an...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Hi dev team, > > > > > > > > > > > > Have you seen this? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories > > > > > > < > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/relocation-of-apache-git-repositories > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I think we should volunteer for a coordinated migration of > > ZooKeeper, > > > > > > although the project is not too big, so the impact of a forced > > > process > > > > > > probably wouldn’t be so much. > > > > > > > > > > > > There’re some benefits though: > > > > > > - We could move to GitBox earlier rather than later, so we could > > take > > > > > > advantage of GitHub write access for example, > > > > > > - Migration needs a write-lock in place during the process, so we > > can > > > > > > avoid some unfortunate surprises, > > > > > > - git-wip-us.apache.org <http://git-wip-us.apache.org/> will > have > > > > CNAMEs > > > > > > to gitbox, so it’ll be operational for some time, but the > read-only > > > > > > git.apache.org <http://git.apache.org/> will go away (not sure > > about > > > > the > > > > > > timing though), that we use in some of our Jenkins builds. It > would > > > be > > > > > > better to migrate Jenkins configs in a coordinated fashion rather > > > than > > > > > when > > > > > > the house is burning. > > > > > > > > > > > > There’re a bunch of unkowns in each project, hence Infra guys > > > recommend > > > > > > the coordinated way, but we need an agreement in the community, > so > > > > please > > > > > > share your thoughts. > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Andor > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > -- Enrico Olivelli > > > > > >
