After quickly checking 3.5 has only added two new exitcodes: “unable to access 
datadir” and “unable to start admin server”, but previous exit codes haven’t 
been changed.

Between 3.5.x and 3.5.5 I haven’t seen any changes in ExitCodes, however it’s 
kind of a mess that ExitCode enum has been backported to 3.5 from master, but 
usages are not! As a consequence most of values in the ExitCode.java are not 
used in the codebase.

Anyway. I don’t see a reason for holding off 3.5.6 due to that BookKeeper 
issue, although I’d love to see BookKeeper working nicely with ZK 3.5.

Regards,
Andor




> On 2019. Sep 16., at 13:19, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Thank you Norbert
> 
> I am investigating a potential problem in ZK 3.5 branch I am seeing in the
> upgrade of ZooKeeper in BookKeeper project regarding the exit codes of the
> shell (ZooKeeperMain)
> 
> see
> https://github.com/apache/bookkeeper/pull/2112#issuecomment-531576441
> 
> If the problem is there and the fix is a one-liner I will try to submit a
> patch before sending the VOTE email for 3.5.6
> 
> Do you know if we changed the exit code of the CLI from 3.4 and 3.5 ? or
> from 3.5-BETA to 3.5.5 ?
> 
> Enrico
> 
> Il giorno lun 16 set 2019 alle ore 12:46 Norbert Kalmar
> <nkal...@cloudera.com.invalid> ha scritto:
> 
>> I merged it to master and 3.5
>> Thanks Enrico!
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2019 at 5:49 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> Too quick:
>>> I see we have a "LICENSES" files issue, we changed netty dependency from
>>> netty-all to separate bundles.
>>> 
>>> I think we must have separate files, in order to be consistent with other
>>> jars
>>> 
>>> I will send a patch soon
>>> 
>>> Enrico
>>> 
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli   11366  9 set 18.57
>>> netty-all-4.1.29.Final.LICENSE.txt
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  272683 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-buffer-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  316412 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-codec-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  578177 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-common-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  394702 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-handler-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli   32275 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-resolver-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  461842 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-transport-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli  115477 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-transport-native-epoll-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> -rw-r--r--. 1 eolivelli eolivelli   31171 30 ago 19.44
>>> netty-transport-native-unix-common-4.1.29.Final.jar
>>> 
>>> Il giorno sab 14 set 2019 alle ore 16:42 Enrico Olivelli <
>>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>> 
>>>> branch-3.5.6 is good to go now.
>>>> I am preparing the release artifacts now.
>>>> 
>>>> I hope I won't find any other show stopper on my way
>>>> 
>>>> Enrico
>>>> 
>>>> Il giorno ven 6 set 2019 alle ore 17:45 Enrico Olivelli <
>>>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>> I have moved all of the pending issue for 3.5.6 to 3.5.7.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I did not have the flag "do not send email", I hope I have not
>> generated
>>>>> too much spam
>>>>> 
>>>>> Enrico
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Il giorno lun 2 set 2019 alle ore 01:50 Patrick Hunt <
>> ph...@apache.org>
>>>>> ha scritto:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for driving this Enrico. I created 3.5.7 version in JIRA to
>>>>>> facilitate. LMK if there's more that you need.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Patrick
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:59 AM Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Can any PMC create the 3.5.7 version on JIRA please ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> I have to move all of the issues targeted 3.5.6 to that version.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> IMHO we should not target issues directly to 3.5 branch if not
>>> strictly
>>>>>>> needed.
>>>>>>> We have a lot of issues, 181, targeted to 3.5.6 and not resolved.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> This is my search
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20fixversion%3D3.5.6%20and%20resolution%20%3D%20Unresolved%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC%2C%20updated%20DESC
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> We should retarget them to 3.6.0 or clear the fixVersion attribute.
>>>>>>> You cannot set "fixVersion" if you do not intend to provide a
>> patch,
>>>>>> can
>>>>>>> you ?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Il giorno ven 30 ago 2019 alle ore 19:11 Enrico Olivelli <
>>>>>>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I am preparing for the release.
>>>>>>>> It is the first time for me so I have to setup a bunch of things,
>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> GPG
>>>>>>>> KEYS.....
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The procedure (1) is very detailed, I hope I won't encounter
>> issues
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> I am not sure I will be able to be ready for a VOTE tonight.
>>>>>>>> I hope I will be able to prepare a good RC during the weekend
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> (1)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>> 
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToRelease+using+maven
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Il giorno ven 30 ago 2019 alle ore 13:43 Enrico Olivelli <
>>>>>>>> eolive...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Il ven 30 ago 2019, 02:56 Brian Nixon <brian.nixon...@gmail.com
>>> 
>>> ha
>>>>>>>>> scritto:
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> I agree that ZOOKEEPER-3056 would be super nice to have in
>> 3.5.6.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Does anyway want to pick it up? I can want until early next
>> week.
>>>>>>>>> Otherwise I will start tonight (within 6-7 hours)
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Don't know what shape the solution should be but don't think it
>>>>>>> requires
>>>>>>>>>> that much code - just thinking and community agreement.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:31 PM Michael Han <h...@apache.org>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> ZOOKEEPER-3056 would be nice to have, I'll try to have a
>> patch
>>>>>> ready
>>>>>>>>>> soon,
>>>>>>>>>>> but it's not a blocker given workarounds available (unless
>>>>>> community
>>>>>>>>>> votes
>>>>>>>>>>> we really need this for 3.5.6).
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:16 AM Zili Chen <
>>> wander4...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Great!
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> IIRC it is possible to add a customized kanban on JIRA
>> site,
>>>>>>>>>>> specifically,
>>>>>>>>>>>> to track all issues marked as "blocker" and to the target
>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>> If we
>>>>>>>>>>>> make use of that we can ensure no blockers before released.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>>>>>>>> tison.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Andor Molnar <an...@cloudera.com.invalid> 于2019年8月29日周四
>>>>>> 下午10:47写道:
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Great +1
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 4:37 PM Enrico Olivelli <
>>>>>>>>>> eolive...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am going to cut 3.5.6, if you have patches to cherry
>>>>>> pick or
>>>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aware of blocker issues for such release please tell me
>>> as
>>>>>> soon
>>>>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> possible.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I will start the procedure tomorrow
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Enrico
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to