I tested with zulu 1.8.212 on the linux machine, and with zulu 1.8.0_163 on MacOS (whoops). I use sdkman on both machine. I upgraded to the newest 1.8 which is _242, at least with sdkman. And sadly, the mentioned tests also fail for me after the upgrade.
So, something in the tests that the new versions of java doesn't like :( I'm not sure either if it's a showstopper or not. But possibly this could come out when using kerberized ZK? Unfortunately kind of hard to test "live". Regards, Norbert On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Szalay-Bekő Máté <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> wrote: > - I compiled and run all the unit tests using Ubuntu 18.04 (incl. the C > client), using OpenJDK 1.8.212 > - I also built and unit tested the python client > - I did some manual tests for the multi-address feature with multiple > virtual networks (using https://github.com/symat/zookeeper-docker-test) > > everything seemed to be OK, however... > > using OpenJDK 1.8.242 or OpenJDK 11.0.6, I got some kerberos related > exceptions when running the following tests: > - QuorumKerberosAuthTest > - QuorumKerberosHostBasedAuthTest > - SaslKerberosAuthOverSSLTest > > the error: > 2020-02-03 12:11:07,197 [myid:localhost:11223] - ERROR > [main-SendThread(localhost:11223):ZooKeeperSaslClient@336] - An error: > (java.security.PrivilegedActionException: > javax.security.sasl.SaslException: GSS initiate failed [Caused by > GSSException: No valid credentials provided (Mechanism level: null > (5001))]) occurred when evaluating Zookeeper Quorum Member's received SASL > token. Zookeeper Client will go to AUTH_FAILED state. > > I tried it with Zulu 11.0.3 version and OpenJDK 11.0.2 version and both > were working fine. So it looks there might some incompatibility with the > more recent JDK releases. (between 1.8.212 - 1.8.242, and also between > 11.0.3 and 11.0.6) > > I also tested on OpenJDK 13.ea.30 and that worked. > > I am not sure if it is a -1 or not... clearly these are some test and JDK > related issues. Also it can be only some strange thing with my environment. > Can someone try to reproduce my problem? > > > Cheers, > Mate > > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 4:31 AM Jordan Zimmerman < > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> > wrote: > > > No big issues with Curator that I could find > > > > +1 (non binding) > > > > -Jordan > > > > > On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > This is the second release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > > > > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most > > notably: > > > - Built-in data consistency check inside ZooKeeper > > > - Allow Followers to host Observers > > > - Authentication enforcement > > > - Pluggable metrics system for ZooKeeper (and Prometheus.io > integration) > > > - TLS Port unification > > > - Audit logging in ZooKeeper servers > > > - Improve resilience to network (advertise multiple addresses for > > > members of a Zookeeper cluster) > > > - Persistent Recursive Watches > > > - add an API and the corresponding CLI to get total count of recursive > > > sub nodes under a specific path > > > > > > The full release notes is available at: > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&version=12326518 > > > > > > *** Please download, test and vote by February 4th 2020, 23:59 UTC+0. > *** > > > > > > Source files: > > > https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.0-candidate-1/ > > > > > > Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachezookeeper-1047/ > > > > > > The staging version of the website is: > > > > > > https://people.apache.org/~eolivelli/zookeeper-3.6.0-candidate-1/website/ > > > > > > The release candidate tag in git to be voted upon: release-3.6.0-1 > > > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/tree/release-3.6.0-1 > > > > > > ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > > > https://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > > > > > > Please note that we are adding a new jar to the dependency set for > > > clients: zookeeper-metrics-providers. > > > > > > Should we release this candidate? > > > > > > Enrico Olivelli > > > > >
