Hello Guys,

I am collecting what we might miss for the 3.5.8 release.

I want to finish a few things in the following days:
- ZOOKEEPER-3727: Fix 3.5 source tarball to represent the git repository
- ZOOKEEPER-3810: a bugfix that I want to backport from 3.6, PR ready
- a few small document fixes that were merged to 3.6, but haven't got
merged to 3.5 due to merge conflicts:
  - ZOOKEEPER-3357
  - ZOOKEEPER-3355
- ZOOKEEPER-3751 Jackson upgrade to fix CVEs, I think it needs to be
backported to branch-3.5 as well
- I'll also look for other CVEs.

Andor just wrote he is working on backporting parts of ZOOKEEPER-3739
(Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to
java.nio.ByteBuffer methods).

Does anyone else want to include / know about anything else I should wait
for?

Thanks,
Mate

On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:25 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 13:43 Szalay-Bekő Máté <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> ha
> scritto:
>
> > Hello All,
> >
> > On the branch 3.5 we have quite a few CVE fixes (netty, jackson) and bug
> > fixes (e.g. fix build on JDK14 and fix three different leader election
> > bugs, etc.). Plus we have the backward compatibility fix of
> > Version.getRevision in ZOOKEEPER-3780.
> >
> > see the resolved/closed Jira issues tagged with 3.5.8:
> >
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3780?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.5.8
> >
> > I was wondering if we should do a 3.5.8 release soon (maybe after we
> > finished 3.6.1). What do you think?
> >
> > 2.5.7 was released on 14 February. How often we supposed to do bugfix
> > releases?
> >
>
> There is no fixed schedule.
> If we have enough stuff and it is worth to cut a release than it can be the
> time for it
>
>
> > I am happy to volunteer as a release manager if you agree that it would
> > make sense.
> >
>
> Sure
>
> I think this release is needed especially for the problems we  addressed
> and the compatibility issue with HBase
>
> Thanks for volunteering
>
> Enrico
>
>
> > Kind regards,
> > Mate
> >
>

Reply via email to