Thanks Mate, I’ve just created PR for the backport. PTAL. Andor
> On 2020. Apr 28., at 15:16, Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Il Mar 28 Apr 2020, 14:38 Mate Szalay-Beko <msza...@cloudera.com.invalid> > ha scritto: > >> Hello Guys, >> >> I am collecting what we might miss for the 3.5.8 release. >> >> I want to finish a few things in the following days: >> - ZOOKEEPER-3727: Fix 3.5 source tarball to represent the git repository >> - ZOOKEEPER-3810: a bugfix that I want to backport from 3.6, PR ready >> - a few small document fixes that were merged to 3.6, but haven't got >> merged to 3.5 due to merge conflicts: >> - ZOOKEEPER-3357 >> - ZOOKEEPER-3355 >> - ZOOKEEPER-3751 Jackson upgrade to fix CVEs, I think it needs to be >> backported to branch-3.5 as well >> - I'll also look for other CVEs. >> >> Andor just wrote he is working on backporting parts of ZOOKEEPER-3739 >> (Handle Java 9/11 additions of covariant return types to >> java.nio.ByteBuffer methods). >> >> Does anyone else want to include / know about anything else I should wait >> for? >> > > Nothing from my side > > Thank you! > Enrico > > >> Thanks, >> Mate >> >> On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 2:25 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Il Ven 17 Apr 2020, 13:43 Szalay-Bekő Máté <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> >> ha >>> scritto: >>> >>>> Hello All, >>>> >>>> On the branch 3.5 we have quite a few CVE fixes (netty, jackson) and >> bug >>>> fixes (e.g. fix build on JDK14 and fix three different leader election >>>> bugs, etc.). Plus we have the backward compatibility fix of >>>> Version.getRevision in ZOOKEEPER-3780. >>>> >>>> see the resolved/closed Jira issues tagged with 3.5.8: >>>> >>>> >>> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3780?jql=project%20%3D%20ZOOKEEPER%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%203.5.8 >>>> >>>> I was wondering if we should do a 3.5.8 release soon (maybe after we >>>> finished 3.6.1). What do you think? >>>> >>>> 2.5.7 was released on 14 February. How often we supposed to do bugfix >>>> releases? >>>> >>> >>> There is no fixed schedule. >>> If we have enough stuff and it is worth to cut a release than it can be >> the >>> time for it >>> >>> >>>> I am happy to volunteer as a release manager if you agree that it would >>>> make sense. >>>> >>> >>> Sure >>> >>> I think this release is needed especially for the problems we addressed >>> and the compatibility issue with HBase >>> >>> Thanks for volunteering >>> >>> Enrico >>> >>> >>>> Kind regards, >>>> Mate
