Thank you for taking a look!  I think you probably saw it already, but I
submitted a quick update to the PR for your review comments.

I don't plan on touching this particular PR any further (unless we find
something that needs addressing obviously), but if you all are supportive
of it, I did have some other ideas for further improving the ZooInspector
tool.  Once this PR gets merged, I can file some additional JIRAs and
continue to make updates if that sounds like a good idea.

Thanks again (to both of you) for taking the time to go through the PR.

~Brent

On Tue, Feb 1, 2022 at 6:28 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté <szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello Brent,
>
> Thanks for the contribution! this contrib project in ZooKeeper was not
> really touched recently, it is great that you were able to refactor / test
> / improve it!
> It will be a nice addition to 3.8.
> (I left a small code style related comment on the PR. I don't think this is
> a blocker, but if you can fix it quickly, then it would be great. Anyway, I
> plan to merge your PR tomorrow.)
>
> Best regards,
> Mate
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 6:30 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Brent,
> > I reviewed the patch.
> > Great work
> >
> > I wish someone else could take a look at it so that we can release it
> > together with 3.8
> >
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > Il giorno lun 31 gen 2022 alle ore 18:25 Brent
> > <brentwritesc...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > I know that with all the release discussions and logging framework
> > updates
> > > things have been really busy.  It's been ~3 weeks or so, so I just
> wanted
> > > to follow up since this is a pretty large pull request from me.  Is
> there
> > > anything else I could supply that would make it easier to review (e.g.
> > > design documentation, a video of demo usage, etc.)?  I appreciate
> > > everyone's time is valuable and limited and I'd like to help make this
> PR
> > > as painless as possible, so I don't mind doing more if it would help
> you
> > > all.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > ~Brent
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 4:14 PM Brent <brentwritesc...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Sounds great!  Thank you Enrico and please reach out via email or on
> > the
> > > > PR if I can answer any questions.
> > > >
> > > > ~Brent
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 1:19 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com
> >
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Brent,
> > > >> Thank you very much
> > > >>
> > > >> I will review your patches tomorrow.
> > > >>
> > > >> It is great to move forward with this tool
> > > >>
> > > >> Enrico
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Il Lun 10 Gen 2022, 19:38 Brent <brentwritesc...@gmail.com> ha
> > scritto:
> > > >>
> > > >> > Hi everyone,
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I just submitted a fairly big PR targeted at the ZooInspector
> > contrib
> > > >> > project: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1796
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I'm not sure how many people use ZooInspector or how well
> > maintained it
> > > >> has
> > > >> > been, but I have been getting some value out of it and had
> > submitted a
> > > >> > couple fixes previously:
> > > >> >
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1551
> > > >> > https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1601
> > > >> >
> > > >> > My biggest remaining issue has been performance.  When using it
> > over a
> > > >> > network to a remote Zookeeper cluster, especially with many
> ZNodes,
> > it
> > > >> has
> > > >> > been almost unusably slow.  In my testing, the changes I just
> > > >> > submitted seem to fix a lot of these issues.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Since Exhibitor (https://github.com/soabase/exhibitor) hasn't
> > received
> > > >> an
> > > >> > update since 2018, I was hoping to put some more effort back into
> > making
> > > >> > ZooInspector a bit more widely usable again.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > I wanted to send a note to this mailing list in case it warranted
> > > >> further
> > > >> > discussion since I know it's a substantial change and I haven't
> > been a
> > > >> very
> > > >> > frequent contributor up to this point.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Thank you!
> > > >> >
> > > >> > ~Brent
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to