Hi,

Thanks for eolivelli's review and approval, this PR[1] is waiting for
another reviewer to proceed. I'd like to bump this thread to see if any
committer could help on reviewing :)

Best,
tison.

[1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1826


Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2022年2月24日周四 23:20写道:

> Tison
>
> Il Gio 24 Feb 2022, 15:29 tison <wander4...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Here is an initial PR[1] you can give a review. I think the script is
> > enough for the original purpose merging readOnly field.
> >
>
> Very good
> I left one comment
>
>
>
> Enrico
>
>
>
> > Best,
> > tison.
> >
> > [1] https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1826
> >
> >
> > Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2022年2月23日周三 20:46写道:
> >
> > > Il Mer 23 Feb 2022, 10:46 tison <wander4...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > >
> > > > Hi Enrico,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for your reply! Do we have end to end tests for the same
> version
> > > of
> > > > client and server now?
> > > >
> > >
> > > We haven't.
> > > We only use the local code to run both the client and the server
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > >
> > >
> > > If we already have such tests, then wrapping them among different
> > versions
> > > > is possible. Otherwise,
> > > > we may add such end to end tests first XD
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > tison.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com> 于2022年2月22日周二 02:14写道:
> > > >
> > > > > I missed this thread.
> > > > > If you manage to keep full compatibility with old clients then I am
> > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > We are missing compatibility tests, it may be a good time to start
> > such
> > > > > suite.
> > > > > We can start by running the client (bash cli) in a docker container
> > > > > probably.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Enrico
> > > > >
> > > > > Il Lun 21 Feb 2022, 17:47 tison <wander4...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Bump the thread for one last try to see if any zookeeper is
> > > interested
> > > > in
> > > > > > this topic.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > tison.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to