Thank you Kezhu!

This case somehow indicates that we're under a "high" traffic. lol.

Best,
tison.


Kezhu Wang <kez...@gmail.com> 于2023年6月16日周五 19:20写道:

> Hi Enrico,
>
> I presented a fix https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/2012.
>
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 6:47 PM Enrico Olivelli <eolive...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello ZooKeepers,
> >
> > Current master branch is broken, see the errors below.
> >
> > Maybe we committed patches and there were some unexpected conflicts
> > undetected by git.
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> > [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-compiler-plugin:3.8.1:testCompile
> > (default-testCompile) on project zookeeper: Compilation failure:
> > Compilation failure:
> >
> > [ERROR]
> /Users/enricoolivelli/dev/zookeeper/zookeeper-server/src/test/java/org/apache/zookeeper/test/PersistentRecursiveWatcherTest.java:[198,13]
> > no suitable method found for
> >
> assertEvent(java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue<org.apache.zookeeper.WatchedEvent>,org.apache.zookeeper.Watcher.Event.EventType,java.lang.String)
> >
> > [ERROR]     method
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.PersistentRecursiveWatcherTest.assertEvent(java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue<org.apache.zookeeper.WatchedEvent>,org.apache.zookeeper.Watcher.Event.EventType,java.lang.String,org.apache.zookeeper.data.Stat)
> > is not applicable
> >
> > [ERROR]       (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
> >
> > [ERROR]     method
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.PersistentRecursiveWatcherTest.assertEvent(java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue<org.apache.zookeeper.WatchedEvent>,org.apache.zookeeper.Watcher.Event.EventType,java.lang.String,long)
> > is not applicable
> >
> > [ERROR]       (actual and formal argument lists differ in length)
> >
> > [ERROR]     method
> >
> org.apache.zookeeper.test.PersistentRecursiveWatcherTest.assertEvent(java.util.concurrent.BlockingQueue<org.apache.zookeeper.WatchedEvent>,org.apache.zookeeper.Watcher.Event.EventType,org.apache.zookeeper.Watcher.Event.KeeperState,java.lang.String,long)
> > is not applicable
>

Reply via email to