Re: msn-pecan 0.1 good enough?

[Stephen Holt]

>
>
>
> Stephen Holt: that "feature regressions" argument sounds like FUD;
> it's something that people say, but it's not really true.
>
>
So, just to be clear, there is nothing the current MSN prpl in libpurple can
do that msn-pecan cannot in it's current state?