On Sunday, March 21, 2010, Stephen Holt <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Stephen Holt: that "feature regressions" argument sounds like FUD; > it's something that people say, but it's not really true. > > > So, just to be clear, there is nothing the current MSN prpl in libpurple can > do that msn-pecan cannot in it's current state? >
I haven't been keeping up with the states of the two implementations, however I think Stephen is remembering when we switched from Pecan to the stock prpl. At that time the prpl in Libpurple was at P15 and Pecan was at P13. The key difference was that Pecan did not yet fully support offline messages while the Libpurple prpl did. My understanding is that not only does Pecan now have offline messages, but it now supports more features than the stock prpl, such as receipt of handwritten messages. Is this accurate Filipe? Jordan -- Jordan
