On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 08:27, Evan Schoenberg, M.D. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Apr 22, 2010, at 8:03 AM, Alan Humpherys wrote: > > > I must confess to being a complete novice when it comes to integration of > a new libpurple version into our code base, but seeing the relatively large > numbers of patches which are necessary to fix security and compatibility > issues in our existing version, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to pull > the new version of the library and do both a 1.3.11 and a 1.4B18 release > with it. (Of course, I defer to the experts on the wisdom of that path). > > Doing a major libpurple version upgrade on the 1.3 branch would be a large > undertaking; I definitely don't think it's worth doing. A minimal release > with the plucked changes to fix some protocol breakages seems reasonable, > and it should easy enough to do. > > > I know that I haven't been active in the project, but have some time over > the next weeks that I can invest. (It would also be great if I had a more > experienced expert to collaborate with.) I really think we need to push > hard and get a completed 1.4 out the door. > > I fully agree. What we need is a deadline; 1.4 has languished long enough, > and the fact of the matter is that fixing every bug is simply an impossible > goal. > > I propose Thursday, May 13. It's a largely selfish date: I'll have a > couple days prior in which I am free to focus on nothing but hacking on > Adium, and since I have company in town that weekend (and every other > weekend in May) I don't want to release on or immediately before the > weekend. > I'm done with this semester, and gaining a huge amount of free time, before then. Let's do it. > > Let's ship. The momentum we gain - both for ourselves, seeing a major > release finally moving, and from the outside as folks see how much we've > accomplished - will make 1.4.1 a much easier goal than 1.4 was. > > Thoughts? > > -Evan > > > > > > > Let me know how I can best help, > > > > Alan > > -- > > [email protected] > > > > > > On Apr 20, 2010, at 10:11 PM, John Bailey wrote: > > > >> On 04/20/2010 11:22 PM, Eric Richie wrote: > >>> Are there any outstanding issues other than the Y! thing (and maybe the > MSN security patch) that we would need to take care of for 1.3.11? > >> > >> Gadu-Gadu support in the libpurple 2.5.9 included in Adium 1.3.10 is > quite > >> deficient as well, due to the bundled libgadu being practically > prehistoric. It > >> looks like the following revisions from the im.pidgin.adium.1-4 branch > would > >> need to be plucked (if cleanly possible) to the im.pidgin.adium.1-3 > branch to > >> fix both Gadu-Gadu and Yahoo! JAPAN: > >> > >> e6348335d02982e12c2be1a30517d7ea46569c51 > >> 48c2553ef4b46482b26f021c97d2569c1b053227 > >> 6a525a20cfffe39369fb58b72aeaf5194aa468d9 > >> 692d75f8dc28e433931f5a4b036c145f132c42ba > >> 91e41e5288f7f90048a8cf7d05bedc87aacfa3de > >> 47085b9fe64551b697ca9ba601b8c0323e47c449 > >> > >> I have not yet tried to apply these revisions to the adium.1-3 branch. > I don't > >> see a point in doing that until there's a decision about whether a > 1.3.11 is > >> necessary. Also, I'm not sure what revision would be necessary for the > MSN > >> security fix mentioned. If someone does know, I'd be happy to pluck it > across > >> with the others listed above when a decision is reached. > >> > >> John > >> > > > > > > > -- Zachary West
