Why don't we shoot for Tuesday the 11th then? I see someone (seemingly David Munch) added the meeting on Trac:
http://trac.adium.im/wiki/AdiumMeetings I put up a rough skeleton of an agenda - feel free to add/remove/change things. Jordan On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Eric Richie <[email protected]> wrote: > If you guys think they'll be helpful, then sure, let's do it. Before it was > getting to the point where they didn't seem to really be worthwhile because > no one had much of any time to act on the things we discussed. > What nights would work best for everyone? We should probably continue to > have them on a weeknight as we have previously. Mondays and Tuesdays are > probably the most convenient for me but if something else works better for > the majority then I can do that as well. > Let's shoot for the 2nd week of May as our target for the next one so that > we can discuss any issues that come up in meeting Evan's suggested deadline > for 1.4. Sound good? Just let me know when people think they might be > available so we can pick a time. > > -Eric > > > > On Apr 24, 2010, at 9:40 AM, shawn khan wrote: > > Hello, > > I know I am new to the adium project and code. I just want to give my > opinions on meetings. I believe that meetings will help move the code > forward even if a little bit at a time. I believe we should do this > bi-weekly. As I know these meetings will help new developers get into the > code and project. > > Thanks, > Shawn > > On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Jordan <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I realize there might be a bit of a stigma associated with meetings >> and that there'll always be a few people who can't make them, but I >> think that regular meetings (bi weekly or at least monthly) might help >> spur development. This includes our formerly active developers and the >> new folks who might have a few questions and would like to get more >> involved in the processes we use to decide on inclusion of new >> features (among other things). >> >> It would also help us come to consensus for dates to set our >> milestones - we used to follow them somewhat closely and it worked >> fairly well. We could also go over some of those remaining tickets in >> 1.4 and try to have Robby and I (and others?) help triage the >> remaining 1.4 tickets. For example, we could specify a critical >> priority for tickets to be placed in the 1.4 milestone. >> >> If not regular meetings, then we should probably at least have one >> before the release of 1.4 just to make sure everyone is on the same >> page. Although we do a pretty good job of keeping Trac in-line with >> our priorities (minus some of the newer tickets that haven't been >> triaged yet), there are always some things that are ambiguous and >> should be discussed. >> >> Thoughts on this? Was it Thursdays we used to hold them on in previous >> years? >> >> If Eric is OK with this, then he and I could take care of arranging it >> as he and Chris had done in previous years. >> >> Have a great weekend everyone! >> >> Jordan >> >> >> >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 7:14 AM, Robert Vehse <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Am 24.04.2010 um 07:59 schrieb Christopher Forsythe: >> > >> >> I'm sorry, I mistook the 11 tickets not to a severity of Major or >> >> Regression to mean that weren't as important as the 4 in those >> >> severities. >> >> If you think that keeping tickets which are "minor" in the milestone, I >> >> guess the meaning of the minor severity has changed in a way that I was >> >> not >> >> aware of. >> >> >> >> My apologies for any offense, none was meant. I was only pointing out >> >> that >> >> the easiest thing to do to to get a release out is to get a few things >> >> off >> >> the list which can wait for a later release. >> > >> > No worries. I think I overreacted. Some of the tickets are not marked as >> > they should be though. >> > >> > >> > > >
