Hi Sean,
Does the PIP module here support both local platform builds and
CI builds?
I am looking at the name of the repo and trying to align with
the edk2-tools-library repo name so it is obvious the two repos
are related. Maybe focus on the CI part for the name and we
reuse the CI features to simplify local builds.
edk2-tools-ci
Finalizing the name is the only open I am aware of.
Thanks,
Mike
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io [mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io]
> On Behalf Of rebe...@bluestop.org
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2019 4:34 PM
> To: Sean <sean.bro...@microsoft.com>;
> devel@edk2.groups.io
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] RFC for Edk2-ToolEnv
>
> On 2019-05-14 17:23, sean.brogan via groups.io wrote:
> > Take a look at the proposed content and how it is
> used. We even have
> > examples of calling from DevOps and i don't think
> Jenkins would be any
> > different. I don't think we are trying to duplicate CI
> > functionality. We are providing the "last mile" so
> that those CI
> > engines can run EDK specific tests and tools. Standard
> CI engines
> > have no concept of packages, DSC, FDF, INFs, firmware,
> etc.
>
>
> Okay, that's great. Of course we do also have lots of
> code running on
> the CI server at work, not the client, that does things
> like packaging
> etc., and this proposal will include server-side code
> too.
>
> Also, I don't think there is anything that'll be as
> nicely integrated as
> this, so I'm happy with it.
>
>
> --
> Rebecca Cran
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#41262): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/41262
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/31614611/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
