I thought the patch is from Ard but it was from Gerd.
So, the question is for Gerd.:)
I am a bit nervous on this change because it's a behavior change and may cause
certain devices malfunction and it's a silent failure.
Thanks,
Ray
> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ni, Ray
> Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 11:09 AM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; a...@kernel.org; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Pawel Polawski <ppola...@redhat.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Gao, Liming
> <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Oliver Steffen
> <ostef...@redhat.com>; Leif Lindholm
> <quic_llind...@quicinc.com>; Justen, Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>;
> Yao, Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; Chang,
> Abner <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridge: io range
> is not mandatory
>
> Ard,
> can you explain more?
>
> Your code changes the PciHostBridge driver to ignore the failure of IO
> allocation.
> If IO requirement of certain PCI(E) devices can be ignored, can you change
> the IncompatiblePciDevice protocol implementation
> to override the IO request from the devices?
>
> Thanks,
> Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ard
> > Biesheuvel
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:49 AM
> > To: edk2-devel-groups-io <devel@edk2.groups.io>; Gerd Hoffmann
> > <kra...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: Pawel Polawski <ppola...@redhat.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> > <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Gao, Liming
> > <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn>; Wu, Hao A <hao.a...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray
> > <ray...@intel.com>; Oliver Steffen
> > <ostef...@redhat.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com>; Justen,
> > Jordan L <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>; Yao,
> > Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>; Chang, Abner <abner.ch...@hpe.com>; Wang,
> > Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v5 1/6] MdeModulePkg/PciHostBridge: io
> > range is not mandatory
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Apr 2022 at 09:37, Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > io range is not mandatory according to pcie spec,
> > > so allow bridge configurations without io address
> > > space assigned.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org>
> >
> > Could one of the MdeModulePkg maintainers please get this reviewed? Thanks.
> >
> > > ---
> > > MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > > index b20bcd310ad5..712662707931 100644
> > > --- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > > +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Pci/PciHostBridgeDxe/PciHostBridge.c
> > > @@ -1085,6 +1085,9 @@ NotifyPhase (
> > > RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index].Base = BaseAddress;
> > > RootBridge->ResAllocNode[Index].Status = ResAllocated;
> > > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "Success\n"));
> > > + } else if ((Index == TypeIo) && (RootBridge->Io.Base ==
> > > MAX_UINT64)) {
> > > + /* optional on PCIe */
> > > + DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "PCI Root Bridge does not provide IO
> > > Resources.\n"));
> > > } else {
> > > ReturnStatus = EFI_OUT_OF_RESOURCES;
> > > DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Out Of Resource!\n"));
> > > --
> > > 2.35.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#89341): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/89341
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/90623478/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
