Add Leif and Michael to cc list
Hi Sunil,
On 2024/3/14 13:28, Sunil V L wrote:
Hi Ran,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 12:29:53PM +0800, Ran Wang wrote:
Hi Sunil,
On 2024/3/8 19:44, Sunil V L wrote:
On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 12:31:26AM -0800, WangYang wrote:
Hi,Sunil V L
How about this status.
-----原始邮件-----
发件人: WangYang <wangy...@bosc.ac.cn>
发送时间: 2024-02-28 14:34:11 (星期三)
收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io, suni...@ventanamicro.com
抄送: "Yang Wang" <wangy...@bosc.ac.cn>, "Ran Wang" <wang...@bosc.ac.cn>, "YunFeng Yang"
<yangyunf...@bosc.ac.cn>, "YaXing Guo" <guoyax...@bosc.ac.cn>, "Bamvor Jian ZHANG" <zhangj...@bosc.ac.cn>
主题: [edk2-devel] [PATCH] NanhuDev:Add BOSC NanhuDev platform
This commit adds the initial support for BOSC's
nanhu platform which provides up to 2 RISC-V RV64
processor cores.
Somehow I missed this when you sent first. What do you mean by "initial
support" here?
The "initial" means so far we only support minimal system (CPU + UART), will
integrate more periphrals in the future.
Okay. Can you boot an OS with this minimal support? Why not add full
support itself? Since the structure needs to be reviewed, it would be
better to have complete picture IMO.
Currently we could boot Linux kernel image which is integraed as a FV
(declared in *.fdf, but not inclued in this patch). I guess this
solution cannot be accepted by upstream, right?.
Or we could also add an PCIE controller driver patch to load kernel from
NVME card.
Regards,
Ran
Looks like you are following old integrated opensbi approach.
If so, I recommend you to look at payload design. You can see Sophgo
board as reference.
Thanks for advices, so we need to rebase our work on
Silicon/Sophgo/SG2042Pkg/Sec/Sec* rather than
RISC-V/PlatformPkg/Universal/Sec/Riscv64/Sec*, right?
Yes. It is better to use edk2 as a payload for opensbi.
Also, please remember to CC all maintainers as per Maintainers.txt.
Does the "all maintainers" mean all mentioned in Maintainers.txt, or just
RISC-V related?
You need to copy the overall maintainers for edk2-platforms repo (Mike
and Leif). They need to approve the structure for your platforms. Then
you can copy RISC-V maintainers. Add one patch to update the maintainers
for your platform as well.
Thanks,
Sunil
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#116856): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/116856
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/104619268/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
