On 3 October 2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi. This actually works, thank you !
If you are talking about my patches I sent the list, then a] This work around is for all modems. It uses modem memory for reception of SMSs and uses direct SMS sending to send SMSs. It tends to be more reliable. b] Andreas Fink has written the AT2 driver which uses SMS version two and has a few advantages because of that. I suggest he re-writes the list on how to set up that driver so we can all help debug it with him. c] I will have new patches as of tomorrow which fix a few more bugs and yeild the original AT driver even better then my last patches. The only way to loose SMSs is by sending and failing to send 4 times, as per the RETRIES variable, set in the smsc_at.c file. d] I require a nominee before I can patch the CVS tree ... would you / someone mind nominating me ? e] The new patches will stop the kannel log from growing when there are no incvoming / outgoing SMSs ... this was originally for debugging. > (The sender now gets a 'message delivered' instead of > 'problem with receiving device' message). > > They (kannel and the modem) sure do talk a lot, though. > > But, I'm curious: This workaround, is it generally needed > because of a problem with falcom, or is it temporary because > something else needs to be fixed ? > I don't see a performance problem in polling a gsm_modem > (it doesn't get messages that quick anyway), but > I wish the kannel.log didn't grow when there is no traffic... > > Also, I'm still curious about the return codes... > -- Matt Common computer data descriptions.... bit lick nibble byte
