> Nice indeed, they say it even has the rackmount interface :)
> The only thing is it has PCI/ISA interface which is not always the best
> solution, while edgeport use USB port.
> Does it work good with simultaneous multiport traffic loads?

I haven't done any serious intensive stress testing yet (like bang it
against a wall or anything), but there hasn't been ANY problems with it so
far. We've had 6 Wavecom's hooked up on it for several months.

cheers,

Frederik Ammitzbøll
Unwire
Vestergade 12A, 3.
1456 København K
Denmark

Tlf.:  +45 33 33 08 70
Mobil: +45 27 11 99 99
Fax :  +45 33 33 09 70
Web:   www.unwire.dk


> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Frederik Ammitzbøll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "KannelDevel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 4:53 PM
> Subject: SV: For your kind attention!
>
>
> As an alternative to Alexei's link below you might want to check out:
>
> http://www.moxa.com/product/intellio/C320.htm
>
> Works like a charm on any linux platform.
>
> cheers,
>
> Frederik Ammitzbøll
> Unwire
> Vestergade 12A, 3.
> 1456 København K
> Denmark
>
> Tlf.:  +45 33 33 08 70
> Mobil: +45 27 11 99 99
> Fax :  +45 33 33 09 70
> Web:   www.unwire.dk
>
>
> > Just FYI, we currently run AT2 module from lastest CVS with 8(!) siemens
> > m20T devices connected on same machine and we use them for both
> > incoming and
> > outgoing traffic.
> > System is stable, and works smooth.
> >
> > If you wonder how one connected 8 serial devices to a PC, check this :
> > http://www.ionetworks.com/products/edgeport.html
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "idowu oduntan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:47 AM
> > Subject: Re: For your kind attention!
> >
> >
> > > I am presently setting up Kannel to run as an SMS
> > > gateway using compiled version of 1.0.3. I am using a
> > > siemens GSM modem as the SMSC.
> > >
> > > With my present configurations, I can send messages
> > > through my smsc from the admin html console via a
> > > browser. But messages sent to me are not received and
> > > no indications of these are made in any form, even in
> > > the logs.
> >
> > If you are running an "older firmware version on your Siemens M20 then
> > this may be the cause. Please search the mailing list archive for an
> > update location someone posted recently, where you can get the update
> > for the firmware software.
> >
> > Anyway, 1.0.3 is quite old, considered in terms of smsc_at.c (the GSM
> > modem SMSC implementation). You should be using a CVS snapshot
> > instead. Unfortunatly we currently don't have any "latest" stable
> > release, so CVS is appropriate for now.
> >
> > > I am not receiving messages via the smsc. Is there a
> > > specific receive-thread that must be started before
> > > messages can be recieved?
> >
> > No, bearerbox is responsible for serial com communication and smsbox
> > for the processing.
> >
> > > Does the bearerbox listen continuosly to the smsc and
> > > is there a way I can dictate the frequency at which
> > > the bearerbox retrieves messages from the smsc(phone
> > > modem).
> >
> > No, bearerbox does (or should :)) listen continously for incomding
> > messages.
> >
> > Can you send as much messages as you want via the SMSC, but don't
> > receive any? Or may it be that you send a couple of messages, the SMSC
> > connection drops and you try to receive and wonder why it does not
> > come?
> >
> > Anyway, a bearerbox and smsbox log (not to heavy please :)) would be
> > best for the list to review what you are trying.
> >
> > Stipe
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Wapme Systems AG
> >
> > Münsterstr. 248
> > 40470 Düsseldorf
> >
> > Tel: +49-211-74845-0
> > Fax: +49-211-74845-299
> >
> > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------
> > wapme.net - wherever you are
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>


Reply via email to