Andrea Viscovich wrote:
> 
> Something very very bad happens sometimes with smsbox.
> This isn't the first time it happens
> Don't really know why, but it closes connection.
> Maybe it's because it receives an empty sms, but
> I have omit-empty = true in sms-service group.
> I give you here all the details, and I really hope I can solve this bug
> that keeps craching smsbox.
> (this is cvs (about one month ago) with at2 (on win2000).
> 2002-02-12 23:53:40 [7] DEBUG: HTTP: Status line: <HTTP/1.1 500 Internal
> Server Error>
> 2002-02-12 23:53:40 [5] ERROR: Start marker was damaged for area 0x10024cf8
> 2002-02-12 23:53:40 [5] ERROR: Could not find area information.
> 2002-02-12 23:53:40 [5] PANIC: gwlib/octstr.c:2034: seems_valid_real:
> Assertion `gw_check_is_allocated(ostr)' failed. (Called from
> gw/smsbox.c:698:url_result_thread.)

so we have a failing assertion checking which is panicing here in
smsbox and causing it to stop.

Unfortunatly our cvs checkout is not up to date so I don't see what is
happening on *your* line 698 of smsbox.c. The current cvs is out of
scope for url_result_thread() for this line number.

Could you please copy a short passage around that number, or the
url_result_thread() function, so we can see what operations causes the
assertion problem.

Usually you will do something nasty with a orctstr* when you get this.

BTW, if this is happening from time to time and crashing your
bearerbox you may either consider to run smsbox as NT service and
define a restart with Win200 internal mechanisms for the service or
use a shell wrapper script around calling smsbox which loops infinitly
around calling smsbox. (But this should be considered a kludge, of
course).

Stipe

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG

Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf

Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299

E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
wapme.net - wherever you are

Reply via email to