Yep, I would like it. My modem sometimes hangs (*) and the messages stay in sim card, so I don't mind having the messages going through the sim card or even if the messages go directly to kannel, kannel could read every message present in phone and sim when starting.
(*) Can I do a keepalive function to AT, like sending an AT so if the modem hangs, kannel would reopen the connection ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:49 PM Subject: Re: New Stable release Sure we can, someone has to merge two things and add config variable , than we have to test it for a few weeks .. are you sure thats what you want ? ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno David Rodrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:43 AM Subject: Re: New Stable release > Cant we have it configurable in ./configure or config file to choose between > direct, sim card or phone memory has I suggested before ? > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Alexei Pashkovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:40 PM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > As regarding to SIM buffering patches : > I don't think these are to be included in any type of stable version, and > there's a very simple and clear reason. > Sim card has flash memory where it stores those messages if they are not > requested to be output to the prompt by terminal. > Every flash memory card has it's life circle , which is pretty short > comparing to count of messages one would want to receive/send with it in > production environment. > Let's say normal Sim will not live if you save to it over 10.000 - 50.000 > sms. > While 10.000 seems to be a huge number, it is not actually that big, and > in production environments I personally saw a sim card which received over > 100.000 sms. > This would not be possible if it would be over the "Sim buffering" technics, > the card would simply go screwed. > So far, I suppose this buffering conception is for risky people only, and we > definately would not want to include in stable release something that could > damage user's hardware. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:19 AM > Subject: Re: New Stable release > > > > Oded Arbel wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would > > > probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing > > > AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS. > > > what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be > > > merged in the old/new AT module ? > > > > I haven't reviewed them and I'm out of time scope until next Sunday. > > > > If anyone other can suggest in merging the patch in please take your > > heads up on the list and present your review results and tell us how > > far you have tested it. > > > > Stipe > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Wapme Systems AG > > > > Münsterstr. 248 > > 40470 Düsseldorf > > > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > wapme.net - wherever you are > > > > > > > > >
