Yes, it will work.
I don't care much for +CMTI: (except about taking care that Kannel
doesnot interpert it +CMT:). the main reason is that (a) checking the
memory directly (+CPMS?) "feels" more "safe" as I don't care if I miss a
message from the modem for some reason. also - this way we can read
messages that were stored before Kannel was activated.
Checking also for +CMTI: and reading the single message delivered is
more correct (so once the patch is submitted to the CVS, my next goal is
to implement that), but it is also more complicated (mainly as we have
to implement both +CMTI: processing /and/ +CPMS quering), and I'm a big
fan of the KISS principle :-)
--
Oded Arbel
m-Wise Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
A man said to the universe: "Sir, I exist!"
"However," replied the universe, "The fact has not created in me a sense
of obligation."
-- Stephen Crane
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, March 18, 2002 2:11 PM
> To: Oded Arbel; Andrea Viscovich; Kannel-devel "E-mail"
> Subject: Rif: RE: [PATCH] Resubmit: "sim buffering" support for AT2.
>
>
> Hi Oded,
> I'll try tonight your patch,
> by the way you say:
>
> >this patch, allow you to work
> >around the problem by not caring whether messages land in
> >memory or not.
>
> I noticed that you don't care for +CMTI: messages,
> only for +CMGR.
> By the way when I got an sms which lands into sm
> memory I have:
> +CMTI: "SM",n
> That's why I'm wondering if this will work with your patch.
> Or I lost something in your patch?
> Thanks
> Andrea
>
>
