Like Oded, our applications don't send SM to multiple receivers, but adding that information seems the right thing to do.
My vote is +1 Angel Fradejas Mediafusión España, S.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.mediafusion.es Tel. +34 91 252 32 00 Fax +34 91 572 27 08 -----Mensaje original----- De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]En nombre de Stipe Tolj Enviado el: jueves 18 de abril de 2002 13:41 Para: Oded Arbel CC: Kannel-devel (E-mail) Asunto: Re: Reporting the number of message parts sent for long messages. Oded Arbel wrote: > > I didn't like the fact that you removed the reporting from the 'error' > section in smsbox_req_handle - correct me if I'm wrong, but this way, if > a split message is sent to multiple receivers, and some of them fail, > the calling application can't tell how many messages were sent to the > receivers that didn't fail. or at least, that is my understanding of the > code. you're right. Any votes for adding the SMS split information even if some of the multi-requests fail? I'm +0 for this. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
