-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 14 January 2003 00:30, Stipe Tolj wrote: > Alexander Malysh wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi Stipe, all, > > > > On Monday 13 January 2003 22:54, Stipe Tolj wrote: > > > should we introduce transmitter and receiver dependent status flags, > > > like > > > > > > smpp->conn->status->receiver = SMSCCON_RECONNECTING; > > > smpp->conn->status->transmitter = SMSCCON_ACTIVE. > > > > > > ?? > > > > it looks ugly (IMHO). What about , just to allow either receiver or > > transmitter or transceiver ? Like so: > > group = smsc > > smsc = smpp smsc-id = AAA > > port = xxx > > host = xxx > > > > group = smsc > > smsc = smpp smsc-id = AAA > > receive-port = xxx > > receive-host = xxx > > > > ?? > > wuuuooo. that means you can't use the same smsc-id for sending and > receiving. :(
sorry i can't undestand why ? you can have 2 smsc links with the same name ... and for routing you will not have any problems too, because we check SMSCCONN_ACTIVE flag (look in smscconn_usable function). > > Stipe > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > Wapme Systems AG > > Münsterstr. 248 > 40470 Düsseldorf > > Tel: +49-211-74845-0 > Fax: +49-211-74845-299 > > E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > wapme.net - wherever you are - -- Best Regards / Mit besten Grüßen aus Köln Dipl.-Ing. Alexander Malysh ___________________________________ Centrium GmbH Ehrenstrasse 2 50672 Köln Fon: +49 (0221) 277 49 150 Fax: +49 (0221) 277 49 109 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] web: http://www.centrium.de -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+I1GTnX3e5W+uJ0ERAqBxAJ9/l9KLwd266e/m5rR6gIZqcIs+2gCfbckX JVEDhoej/J8j03J3j2nr4PY= =91xu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
