Then probably separation ppg/pure wap pull would be useful, too. I think we can freeze after a new release, that would certainly be ok for me.
Aarno
On Tuesday, June 10, 2003, at 11:12 AM, Alex Judd wrote:
No, I think Stipe's on about the discussions to build a more module based
build with bearerbox forming the core - ie.
- smsbox - wapbox bearerbox - smppbox - etc.
if we split the modules out a little cleaner like this, then you can checkout just the base and the module you want.
It shouldn't be a big job, just need to freeze a cvs branch while someone
starts it would be my thoughts. It would be a good incentive to get Wapme to
let loose the smppbox they've got chained there :)
Alex
----- Original Message ----- From: "Aarno Syvänen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Stipe Tolj" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 9:48 AM Subject: Re: Kannel SMPP interface !
You mean making cvs modules located in different machines ?
Aarno
On Sunday, June 8, 2003, at 01:53 PM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
yes there is. We at Wapme have those beasts arround here still in cages ;)
Reason: We need a modularized configure/make process to have them hooked in cleanly and keep them seperated in own cvs modules.
So could some people *please* think of how to handle configure/make of
"external" cvs modules with the gateway cvs module as base core.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------------------- Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80 40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de ------------------------------------------------------------------- wapme.net - wherever you are
