On Fri, 2004-10-22 at 06:25, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote: > I'd suggest you to use 1.3.2. It is as stable as 1.2.1 but it's a lot > more functional. > This reminds: could we get new stable release at some point? (new devel release wouldn't hurt that much either ... no matter if there has not been many updates, we could simply say like '1.3.3 is almost like 1.3.2, no need to upgrade unless...)
Maybe just release 1.3.2 as 1.4.0, perhaps with some little patches.. (is there?) This way more probably we would get rid of 1.2.x based problems on lists. New releases would also be a good sign to show that the project is alive and kicking. -- &Kalle Marjola ::: Development ::: Helsinki ::: Enpocket
