Hi Alex, As you suggested, I agree that we better move this thread to the ML. I posted the patch to the users ML. I will attach it to this post again for your convenience.
I will fix your points 1, 2 & 4. Probably before the end of this week. About the authentication: Clickatell does not send a username or password along. But I will see if it is possible to make a check on api_id. Besides that, also connect-allow-ip can be used. From what I have heard from the Clickatell techs, their callback HTTP farm connects from behind one single IP address. Cheers, Rene Kluwen Chimit ----------------------------------------------------------------------- alex - 03-14-06 19:31 GMT ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi Rene, I agree with you that we should support as much http interfaces as possible. As to you patch... It's to hard to comment on this patch in mantis. Please post it to ML and I will review it. At least now some comments: 1) please fix comments (they mention Brunet but your patch should support Clickatell ;)) 2) please kill commented blocks which are there due to copy&paste from brunet /* e.g. XSER */ 3) I don't see what should prevent me to send your MO message instead of Clickatell server (not auth. for MO and DLR) 4) minor: please fix coding style (indents) Thanks, Alex
clickatell_MO.patch
Description: Binary data
