Vincent CHAVANIS schrieb:
ok,
You want just be more "flexible" but
i don't see here a real need to be flexible on this.
Even with ssl, localtime, keepalive, mutex, cookies options
(you are growing unecesserarily the data segment)
Then, in term of performances,
you will have the same result as a macro.
??? ... now the relation is easy:
macro way -> same performance, minor flexibility
function pointer -> same performance, more flexibilty
from the user perspective way 2 is ALWAYS preferred. Isn't it?
Stipe
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Kölner Landstrasse 419
40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF)
http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/
mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------
