There is no problem with the list. I got both of your mails OK. Additionally
you obviously receive list messages.
BR,
Nikos
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Conte Mac Donell" <[email protected]>
To: "Stipe Tolj" <[email protected]>
Cc: "kannel_dev_mailinglist" <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, January 25, 2009 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Location header recovering to absoluteURI
I think this email doesn't arrive to the list. here we go again:
I'm just visiting here since i've got an insanely amount of work, but
i'v two comments.
1) Eclipse?, really?
2) I'm not pretty sure about "if (trans->port != 80)", it'll work fine
in most cases but there is a border case when it'll not (Yeah, i know.
I'm anal), the case is when you are going through ssl by port 80 (Yeah
ok, shouldn't happen but you never know). I think the safest way is
append port number always, it won't hurt anyway.
M.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 6:10 PM, Martin Conte Mac Donell
<[email protected]> wrote:
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Stipe Tolj <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi list,
we refuse to follow party defined absoluteURI Location header values.
Which is
"correct" when being pedantic with the specs. But some mayor HTTP
services, i.e.
Yahoo do send URI /xxx as Location header values. This patch ensures we
are able
to recover from this circumstance, and continue the following.
Please review, test and vote for committing to CVS HEAD.
Stipe
