I wonder why it was like that on first place...

I'm +1 for it.

Regards,
--
Alejandro Guerrieri
aguerri...@kannel.org



On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote:

> Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly 
> before, leaving messages in the message store.
> I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client.
>  
> This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next 
> devel-release. Votes?
>  
> == Rene
>  
>  
> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] 
> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'
> Subject: Re: Release plan
>  
> Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of 
> Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences.
>  
> Regards,
> --
> Alejandro Guerrieri
> aguerri...@kannel.org
>  
>  
>  
> On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> 
> 
> If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case.
>  
> == Rene
>  
> From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23
> To: Rene Kluwen
> Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel
> Subject: Re: Release plan
>  
> Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it?
>  
> I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure.
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Alex
> 
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote:
> Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test.
> And they all arrived, without losing a single message.
> 
> == Rene
> 
> 
> > 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org>:
> >> Hi Rene,
> >>
> >> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's
> better to delay let us know.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Alexander Malysh
> >>
> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen:
> >>
> >>> @Alejandro:
> >>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known
> bugs".
> >>>
> >>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has
> >>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice.
> >>>
> >>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox.
> >>>
> >>> == Rene
> >>>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On
> Behalf
> >>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri
> >>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34
> >>> To: Alexander Malysh
> >>> Cc: Kannel Devel
> >>> Subject: Re: Release plan
> >>>
> >>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data
> branch
> >>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho.
> >>>
> >>> To describe the problem further:
> >>>
> >>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's
> only
> >>> observed on MO traffic.
> >>>
> >>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you
> >>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The
> >>> logs shows nothing relevant.
> >>>
> >>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's
> >>> happening.
> >>>
> >>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's
> >>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel
> (pre
> >>> meta-data).
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> --
> >>> Alejandro Guerrieri
> >>> aguerri...@kannel.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi together,
> >>>>
> >>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version.
> >>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge,
> wtls
> >>> branch.
> >>>>
> >>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex:
> >>> could you please
> >>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release
> >>> with Kannel and whether
> >>>> boxes ready for release?
> >>>>
> >>>> The plan would be:
> >>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge
> >>>> 2) next week testing
> >>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe
> >>>>
> >>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether
> >>> somebody sees showstopper.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks,
> >>>> Alexander Malysh
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >  Victor Luchitz
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
>  
> <sqlbox_acks_3.patch>

Reply via email to