It was like that in the first place, because I thought all the "ACK/" messages in the log table were only noise and not relevant.
Since no messages were acked at all, it didn't pose a "problem". But now the messages are acked (more) correctly, these messages need to be acked as well. == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 22:16 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel'; 'Alexander Malysh' Subject: Re: Release plan I wonder why it was like that on first place... I'm +1 for it. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 10/09/2010, at 22:07, Rene Kluwen wrote: Not sure if anybody noticed. But not all sms messages were acked properly before, leaving messages in the message store. I stuck across this, while implementing sqlbox for a client. This patch solves the problem. I would like to see it implemented before next devel-release. Votes? == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:aguerri...@kannel.org] Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 20:30 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Alejandro Guerrieri'; 'Kannel Devel' Subject: Re: Release plan Yes, that was what I was thinking also. I'll try with an older version of Sqlbox and latest SVN to see if there's any differences. Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 10/09/2010, at 20:12, Rene Kluwen wrote: If it has something to do with acks, then this might be the case. == Rene From: Alejandro Guerrieri [mailto:alejandro.guerri...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, 10 September, 2010 19:23 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: Alexander Malysh; Victor Luchitz; Kannel Devel Subject: Re: Release plan Wow, that's odd. Perhaps one of the latest patches solved it? I'll try to reproduce it this weekend to be sure. Regards, Alex On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 7:16 PM, Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> wrote: Just sent a million messages via Nikos' stress test. And they all arrived, without losing a single message. == Rene > 2010/9/10 Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org>: >> Hi Rene, >> >> we can delay release for one more week but not longer. If you think it's better to delay let us know. >> >> Thanks, >> Alexander Malysh >> >> Am 09.09.2010 um 17:46 schrieb Rene Kluwen: >> >>> @Alejandro: >>> Not sure if it is a show stopper. It could be in the section "known bugs". >>> >>> @Alexander: Even though I am +1 for a new release (the older release has >>> been a while) next weekend is really a short notice. >>> >>> @ both: I will investigate the "MO" problem of sqlbox. >>> >>> == Rene >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf >>> Of Alejandro Guerrieri >>> Sent: Thursday, 09 September, 2010 15:34 >>> To: Alexander Malysh >>> Cc: Kannel Devel >>> Subject: Re: Release plan >>> >>> On Sqlbox, we have that unsolved issue that arose when the meta-data branch >>> was applied on Kannel. That's a showstopper imho. >>> >>> To describe the problem further: >>> >>> The issue arises when sqlbox is between bearerbox and smsbox, and it's only >>> observed on MO traffic. >>> >>> When you receive just a few MO messages, it works fine. However, if you >>> sustain a moderate level of inbound messages, some of them are lost. The >>> logs shows nothing relevant. >>> >>> The bug was observed by many users on the list. I've also confirmed it's >>> happening. >>> >>> I'm not sure if it's really an sqlbox bug, or if it's really on Kannel's >>> side. The problem doesn't occur if you use an older version of Kannel (pre >>> meta-data). >>> >>> Regards, >>> -- >>> Alejandro Guerrieri >>> aguerri...@kannel.org >>> >>> >>> >>> On 09/09/2010, at 15:12, Alexander Malysh wrote: >>> >>>> Hi together, >>>> >>>> we are plan to release new Kannel developer version. >>>> For this task we have at this point in time only one patch to merge, wtls >>> branch. >>>> >>>> We also plan to release sqlbox & opensmppbox with Kannel. Rene & Alex: >>> could you please >>>> check status of both boxes and let us know whether you agree to release >>> with Kannel and whether >>>> boxes ready for release? >>>> >>>> The plan would be: >>>> 1) this weekend WTLS branch merge >>>> 2) next week testing >>>> 3) next weekend release but here depends on Stipe >>>> >>>> Please let me know which not commited patches should go in and whether >>> somebody sees showstopper. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Alexander Malysh >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Best regards, > Victor Luchitz > <sqlbox_acks_3.patch>
