Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: > That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone > without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. > > In our case, we'd like to use it for remote logging, so we'd use one of the > "user" facilities to get kannel and _only_ kannel on it, directed to > kannel-only log files. > > I don't see the problem on allowing the extra flexibility. It's definitely > useful for our scenario at least.
yep, agree... we keep the default as Alexander suggest as 'LOG_DAEMON' facility, but provide the capabilities to extend what we want. Right? Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
