Does it hurt to be able to change it? Really? I'm all for correctness, but extra flexibility is usually welcomed imho. -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org
On 30/11/2010, at 15:26, Alexander Malysh wrote: > I mean, we should not allow to change syslog-facility because it's standard > to use daemon. > and most modern syslog daemons allow you match program name and some of then > even regex match. > > Thanks, > Alexander Malysh > > Am 30.11.2010 um 14:58 schrieb Stipe Tolj: > >> Am 30.11.2010 14:45, schrieb Alejandro Guerrieri: >>> That's extremely unflexible imho. If you want to get kannel to log alone >>> without being cluttered with other daemon's logs, you're out of luck. >>> >>> In our case, we'd like to use it for remote logging, so we'd use one of the >>> "user" facilities to get kannel and _only_ kannel on it, directed to >>> kannel-only log files. >>> >>> I don't see the problem on allowing the extra flexibility. It's definitely >>> useful for our scenario at least. >> >> yep, agree... we keep the default as Alexander suggest as 'LOG_DAEMON' >> facility, >> but provide the capabilities to extend what we want. Right? >> >> Stipe >> >> -- >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> Kölner Landstrasse 419 >> 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany >> >> tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) >> http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ >> >> mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org >> ------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > >
