On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintainers to not use rich > boolean Requires/Recommends for the time being until tooling can catch > up and allow us to push updates with them. > > Thanks for your cooperation. > > kevin > -- > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Rich.2FBoolean_dependencies > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/593 > https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-04-01/fesco.2016-04-01-17.00.log.html >
To clarify, the use of rich dependencies is banned from use for Requires: and
Recommends: dependencies. It is safe for use on Suggests:, Enhances: and
Supplements:. In particular, this means that it is still acceptable to generate
language subpackages using Supplements.
("Rich dependencies" refers to dependencies that specify "and" or "or" for
extended rule-processing).
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Langpacks
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel-announce mailing list devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
