>> [1] >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures > > I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused. > > Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary + > current secondary) arch? Or will there be two instances, one for all > primary and one for all secondary?
There will be a single instance of koji for all architectures. > Will a build failure on (say) aarch64 prevent my package from > progressing to Rawhide (x86_64), bodhi etc? Yes. a failure on one arch, just like in primary now for x86_64/i686/armv7hl, this won't change. > On the subject of alternate architectures, I'm making available Fedora > images available in virt-builder for aarch64, armv7l, ppc64 and > ppc64le. There is a complete set for Fedora 23, and a partial set for > Fedora 24 (booting problems on ppc64 - will be solved eventually). I'm not sure what the question is here. > You can run these up on x86_64 hosts quite easily. For an example of > how see: > > > https://rwmj.wordpress.com/2015/04/15/virt-builder-fedora-21-ppc64-and-ppc64le-images/ > > (The virt-install method is now the recommended one. Don't run qemu > directly.) Yes, we use virt-install for deployment of VMs already across aarch64/ppc64/ppc64le. > On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's > rather slow going, but you can take a look at: > > http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary > > There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks. Yes, but this is an "experimental arch" and is completely out of scope of this proposal. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
