Hi, On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, <den...@ausil.us> wrote: > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > requestor re-request of denied requests. >
To add few things here, 1) Why do we need such "Pending ACLs" weekly emails? The package owner already gets notifications when someone requests ACLs. Now if you say people forgets then why not implement something in pkgdb only which will keep sending weekly notification again to package owners that someone has requested ACLs on their packages? What benefit will others get by reading these emails that someone requested ACLs on some package and its owner still not approving? 2) Sometime back I don't remember if I filed issue against pkgdb but I discussed on IRC why not add some text entry box while requesting ACLs. Not everyone knows everyother one here. Let the package owner know why the ACL requestor need other package access. That will help package owners to decide to approve or deny quickly. There can be some people who want to have access/co-maintainer for some packages where they really not needed to be. 3) I am not sure but I think there is some automation for something in pkgdb which automatically grants package access to requstor if package owner do not take action. Correct me if I am wrong here. Regards, Parag. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
