On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <domi...@greysector.net> wrote: > On Thursday, 08 December 2016 at 19:26, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > [...] >> I would like to see us stop pushing non security updates to updates from >> updates-testing entirely and do it in monthly batches instead. we would push >> daily security fixes and updates-testing. However this would make atomic >> host >> 2 week releases much less useful, as there would be no updates except for >> once >> a month. > > You gave just one disadvantage of this proposal and no advantages at > all. Why do you think the above is a good idea? I, for one, do not like > waiting a month to get bug fixes that are not security-related. We are > not RHEL or Microsoft or Adobe. I'm convinced that having bug fixes > available as soon as they're ready is valuable (even if you choose to > wait before installing them). Also, as was pointed out elsewhere in this > subthread, updates get tested only after they're released to stable very > often, so it's also valuable to get the feedback earlier rather than in > a month.
Having bug fixes available sooner also means having regressions. It's inevitable. And that's why there's updates-testing repo, and why it's not enabled by default on release. Why is user opt in to updates-testing insufficient? -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
