Dne 22.6.2017 v 17:15 Petr Šabata napsal(a): > While playing with Base Runtime container base images we noticed > that some packages couldn't be installed with coreutils-single > due to their /bin file dependencies. Unlike the original > coreutils package, coreutils-single doesn't provide the > pre-UsrMove paths. > > Now there are at least two ways to resolve this. We either > > a) change all the packages that depend on /bin/* coreutils > paths, or > b) we add the respective /bin provides to coreutils-single. > > Reading the packaging guidelines[0], I'd lean towards "fixing" > the coreutils subpackage, while the coreutils maintainers > believe we should change packages that depend on obsolete paths. > > For the record, there appear to be only 25 binary packages that > depend on /bin coreutils paths[1];
What is the source of this /bin dependencies? Are they autogenerated or
maintainers are using R: /bin/someutil (where they should be using
%{_bindir}/someutil)?
Vít
> patching coreutils is also
> trivial[2].
>
> I'm curious as to what other people think about both this
> specific case as well as how to solve these issues in general.
>
> Cheers,
> P
>
> [0]
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Effect_of_the_UsrMove_Fedora_Feature
> [1] https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/v-SDa5byzWT93OKPWZ~XKQ/
> [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1463384#c1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
