On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 13:44 -0400, langdon wrote: > OVERVIEW > ======== > > As the modularity work starts to enter Fedora with the Fedora 27 > release, a typical Change Proposal did not seem to do justice on > capturing the moving parts and dependencies for the work to successfully > land. As a result, this document attempts to capture, at a high level, > the goals and deliverables for F27. We are also providing links to the > details to most aspects. Some of the details are still in progress and > will change over the F26 lifecycle (e.g. which modules will be included > for F27 Server). > > THE GOAL > ======== > > The Modularity and Server Working Groups plan, with the help of many > other groups in Fedora, to deliver a fully modularized version of the > Fedora Server Edition. As an equal and complementary goal, the tooling > for module creation/development, deployment and automatic testing will > be as simple and automated as possible. > [*Change*](https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Modular_Server) > > CAVEATS > ======= > > - Although modularity allows for lifecycle changes, there is no plan > for anything besides the normal 13 month lifecycle at this point.
Has there yet been any consideration given to *schedule* changes? One thing this mail makes abundantly clear is that a lot of work is going to be involved in even a minimally viable '1.0' implementation of the Modularity concept. Are we confident that this work can be carried out to a reasonable standard within a typical Fedora release cycle, and if not, are we considering changing the Fedora 27 release schedule? Thanks! -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
