Dne 18.7.2017 v 13:23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a): > On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> >> wrote: >>> The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS- >>> compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built >>> twice. >> Yes, that is true. Some apps will have to be patched for Flatpak, and >> building them as both RPMs and Flatpaks is going to require conditionals. So >> there will be some overhead if we support both. > I think this is unacceptable and a blocker. It didn't work with SCLs and > it won't work with Flatpak, either. Flatpaks must be possible to build > from unmodified RPMs or as part of RPM build process. >
It didn't work for SCLs? How comes? Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
