On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 11:12:46AM -0400, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> This is a pity---BTRFS features looked attractive:

Regardless of the attractiveness of btr's feature sets, the RH 
annoucnement is an indication that they don't consider it supportable 
for the kinds of users that fork over money for RHEL.

And FWIW, I intend to agree.  For all of btrfs's promise, in my personal 
experience it fails the most basic requirement of a filesystem -- to not 
eat data.  *Every* time I've experimented with btrfs, it's ended with 
massive filesystem corruption.  No unclean shutdowns or other hardware 
failures, and I was also just sticking to basic "give me a simple 
filesystem" feature set.

 - Solomon
-- 
Solomon Peachy                         pizza at shaftnet dot org
Delray Beach, FL                          ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to