On Fri, 2017-08-25 at 17:43 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > On 08/25/2017 05:19 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > I dunno what order the list you're using is in, but apparently you > > > didn't do emacs? > > > > > > Igor Gnatenko tried, for Rawhide: > > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=961777 > > > > > > but in fact what happened with that build is ImageMagick support was > > > simply entirely disabled, see > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/emacs/25.2/8.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log > > > : > > > > > > "checking for IMAGEMAGICK... no" > > > > > > there appears to be a partially working patch from January available in > > > a mailing list thread upstream: > > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2017-01/msg00191.html > > > > There's also an emacs bug report: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25967 > > where a whole load of nothing much seems to be happening. Except they > > updated the build scripts to explicitly reject version 7. > > Sorry. I was following Kevin's old list, which appears to be incomplete. > > I'm working on emacs now. PLD-Linux has a patch I'm using. A local mock build > worked > so I'll push my commit shortly. > > http://git.pld-linux.org/gitweb.cgi?p=packages/emacs.git;a=blob;f=imagemagick7.patch;h=199219b4d15ff2dbe325114192420a1241dd5522;hb=HEAD
That patch is at the least clearly not upstreamable, because it just changes everything to 7-style, it would prevent emacs compiling against 6. I don't think emacs would merge a patch which is *only* compatible with 7, I think they're much more likely to prefer a patch which makes emacs build and work with both. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
