On 2017-11-07 02:24, David Tardon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote: >>> poppler-sharp >> >> Are you sure this is necessary? Only libpoppler-glib is mentioned in >> the .dll.config, and libpoppler doesn't have a C API for the assembly to >> load. > > dnf repoquery claims it is.
In this case it's because of the spec itself: Requires: poppler Requires: poppler-glib The latter is clearly required, as the glib bindings are loaded by the assembly and are listed in the .dll.config. The same cannot be true of libpoppler, however, as it is not listed in the .dll.config and has no C API that could be loaded by the assembly. Therefore, it is not clear why poppler is explicitly listed, nor why it should necessitate a rebuild. -- Yaakov Selkowitz Software Engineer - Platform Enablement Group Red Hat, Inc.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
