On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu> wrote: > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > >> If there's continued silence and i686 kernel doesn't get fixed soon, >> I'll file ticket with FESCO asking for i686 arch to be removed from >> main koji and relegated to a secondary koji instance, so i686 doesn't >> block maintainers going forward... > > Not sure it's as simply as that. Doing as you suggest means multilib > support is lost too. >
Right, the proper solution would be officially dropping the i686 kernel, and leaving just the headers package. That would mean that packages which also depend on the actual kernel itself would be modified to drop i686 builds. In such a case, if the SIG were to decide to continue trying for an i686 release, those packages themselves would need to be built on a secondary koji, though they could still use the packages that are build in primary for multilib. Justin _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JZ3YEQ562X237JRSFDFS4QGIJWSXKUMH/
