On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 08:55:16 -0500
Justin Forbes <jmfor...@linuxtx.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:49 AM, Rex Dieter <rdie...@math.unl.edu>
> wrote:
> > Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> >
> >> If there's continued silence and i686 kernel doesn't get fixed
> >> soon, I'll file ticket with FESCO asking for i686 arch to be
> >> removed from main koji and relegated to a secondary koji instance,
> >> so i686 doesn't block maintainers going forward...
> >
> > Not sure it's as simply as that. Doing as you suggest means
> > multilib support is lost too.
> >
>
> Right, the proper solution would be officially dropping the i686
> kernel, and leaving just the headers package. That would mean that
> packages which also depend on the actual kernel itself would be
> modified to drop i686 builds. In such a case, if the SIG were to
> decide to continue trying for an i686 release, those packages
> themselves would need to be built on a secondary koji, though they
> could still use the packages that are build in primary for multilib.
we handled 32-bit s390 multilib under s390x similarly, no kernel, but
all userspace was built
Dan
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/X35UBTEVCTA3SUH4LAHT3ZU3ZKWD2QDA/
