On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 6:04 PM Jens-Ulrik Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:42 AM Jeff Johnson <n3npq....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> There are easier ways to accomplish build ordering using tsort(1) and a >> minor amount of scripting with the same simplifying assumptions your >> program is making: >> 1) no cycles >> 2) every package provides its own name >> 3) every package supplies prerequisite package names without versions >> > > Yes that is essentially what my program does (just using a graph library). > (But I don't think tsort can determine reverse deps etc - but it could be > scripted too sure.) > I should test some larger package sets to see how well rpmbuild-order > scales too... > Just take ripgrep and try to revdep it. > More important than build ordering is scheduling a set of builds >> efficiently across multiple build machines to complete in the shortest >> amount of time taking into account the cost in memory and cpu time of each >> package build. > > > That's correct, and I want to do ordered parallel builds over such > dependency graphs. > > Jens > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RFLLWLFFPAJON5UX7ORXJOZXRBFMIIBV/ > -- -Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/POXRTHEDMEPSWMRJTSW77SF6BVWGSJC3/
