On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 1:21 PM Michal Novotny <cl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 4:56 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2018 at 12:54 AM Jens-Ulrik Petersen <peter...@redhat.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I should test some larger package sets to see how well rpmbuild-order >>> scales too... >>> >> >> BTW are there any tarballs of all the fedora spec files available >> somewhere these days? >> > > They are here: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/lookaside/rpm-specs-latest.tar.xz > Thanks, Michal I played with them a bit. python-* had some circular BRs. perl* worked fine. Of course I tried ghc* before. * got down to broken bcg729.spec. php* had one circular BR pair. nodejs-* seemed okay. (I may not have all the required macros etc installed though.) It seems to be a good way of finding broken or more exotic spec files anyway. ;) I wrote a small script to see the most common package prefices in Fedora: 2915 perl 1995 python 1564 nodejs 729 php 661 rubygem 616 golang 461 ghc 403 rust 284 *-fonts 264 mingw 256 R 139 gnome 123 kf5 122 hunspell 110 erlang 99 drupal7 98 ocaml 85 maven 74 jboss 69 eclipse 67 sugar 58 globus 52 gap 50 apache
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UEP6QJF5VS65N3IYK73EJ3CTXPGRMIJL/
