On Mon, Aug 06, 2018 at 09:58:50PM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 05.08.2018 o 16:36, Jeff Johnson pisze:
> > So you are recommending using 14 lines (with comments) of spec file
> > goop that uses 2 %ifarch build section tests in order to set/unset a
> > macro.
> >
> > There's further baggage in spec files needed to add a BR, pass an
> > option to configure, add libraries to link, etc
>
> Spec files are often wrote in 'I do not know other archs than x86' way.
> I remember going through valgrind support for aarch64 few years ago
> where changes to upstream valgrind were simple but all those packages
> where %{valgrind_archs} was done in "%ifarch x86_64 i686" way required
> patching and then patching...
>
> From what I remember there is no architecture supported by Fedora
> without Valgrind support. We got rid of s390 (32bit) and risc-v does not
> count yet.
As you say, for riscv64 we will want to disable valgrind initially,
but eventually hope to get it enabled.
I don't have the link handy but I talked with upstream a while back
and they (quite rightly) wish to wait and see how popular RISC-V
becomes before thinking about supporting it.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KRU6F6NPHWX3LI2B6CVUSWOKJVZ3RNMB/
