W dniu 07.08.2018 o 15:12, Florian Weimer pisze:
> On 08/06/2018 09:58 PM, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>> From what I remember there is no architecture supported by Fedora
>> without Valgrind support. We got rid of s390 (32bit) and risc-v does not
>> count yet.
>
> valgrind support is not monotonic because architectures evolve. If we
> move the architecture baseline, we could well lose valgrind support
> again. This is true if we moved i686 from SSE2 to AVX2 (clearly
> hypothetical) or s390x from zEC12 to z13 (much less so).
> So I think %{valgrind_arches} clearly has its place going forward.
Sorry for not being clear. I am all in favour of using
${valgrind_arches} wherever it is required.
My note was more directed to packagers to mention that it is now widely
supported tool covering all Fedora architectures (but may change so
${valgrind_arches} is something to keep in specs instead of using
"%ifarch arch1 arch2 arch3").
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6EIKV2GSZVES4HSLGCOBEVIZRR6BVLYT/
