Am Freitag, den 11.01.2019, 15:13 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Am Donnerstag, den 10.01.2019, 23:34 +0100 schrieb Miro Hrončok: > > On 02. 01. 19 22:14, Ben Cotton wrote: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FullyRemoveDeprecatedAndUnsafeFunctionsFromLibcrypt > > > > > > == Summary == > > > This change is about removing binary support for deprecated and > > > unsafe > > > functions and bumping libcrypt.so to libcrypt.so.2. > > > > > > == Owner == > > > * Name: [[User:besser82 | Björn Esser]] < > > > besse...@fedoraproject.org> > > > > > > == Detailed Description == > > > In Fedora 28 we replaced glibc's libcrypt with the fully binary > > > compatible libcrypt library from the external libxcrypt project. > > > There are certain interfaces (encrypt, encrypt_r, setkey, > > > setkey_r) > > > that are mandatory by POSIX or various other standards. > > > ... > > > > Any chance you would have this ready in some copr? > > I'd like to test if Python builds and passes the tests, the > > replacement in F28 > > wasn't without problems IIRC. > > > > A COPR with builds of bumped libxcrypt so-name and all recently > supported versions of Python is here [1]. > > The problems in F28 were about `crypt(3)` not being prototyped in > `unistd.h` anymore. This change doesn't touch any includes or similar > stuff, so I do not expect any fallout. > > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/besser82/xcrypt_soname/
FYI, the build failures in the COPR are *NOT* releated to libxcrypt nor Python's crypt module.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
